USPTO serial 73612676
8:1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 21, 1987
- Examiner
- WISEMAN, MICHELLE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with 8:1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ELK GROVE VILLAGE, IL
ELK GROVE VILLAGE, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY C. MERZ
MARY C MERZ LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYERTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZSTE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601-6780Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PROFESSIONAL HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS - NAMELY, SHAMPOO | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 19, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 9, 1993 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 26, 1992 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1987 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 4, 1987 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |