USPTO serial 73613666
ASSEMBLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASSEMBLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERIZED COLOR GRAPHIC TERMINALS AND WORKSTATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 1997 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |