Drawing for ASSEMBLER

USPTO serial 73613666

ASSEMBLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASSEMBLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sally M. Abel

SALLY M ABEL FENWICH & WTWO PALO ALTO SQPALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTERIZED COLOR GRAPHIC TERMINALS AND WORKSTATIONSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 26, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 1996CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 3, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 30, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 10, 1994CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 26, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 22, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 15, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 1993CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 29, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 4, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 1993CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 13, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 28, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 1992CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 17, 1992CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 10, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 3, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 8, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 8, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 6, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 17, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 21, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 27, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 1988CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 16, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 2, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 13, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance