Drawing for GOLDEN KRUST

USPTO serial 73613969

GOLDEN KRUST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLDEN KRUST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS R. JUETTNER

ROBERT E BROWNE C/O VEDDER, PRICE, KAUFMAN & KAMMHOLZ222 N LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030BREAD, ROLLS AND BUNSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 1991EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 14, 1990ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 19, 1990CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 23, 1990JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 21, 1990EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 12, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 1988UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance