USPTO serial 73616289
HARMAN H
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HARMAN H?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | GAS RANGES, GAS RICE COOKERS, GAS OVENS,GAS INFRARED AND OTHER SPACE HEATERS, GAS, WATER HEATERS, GAS BATH HEATERS, ALL FOR DOMESTIC AND COMMERCIAL USE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |