USPTO serial 73616989
PROTEIN RICH II
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1569053Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 5, 1989
- Examiner
- BYERS, KRISTEN S.
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROTEIN RICH II?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BROOKLYN, NY
BROOKLYN, NY
BROOKLYN, NY
NORTH ARLINGTON, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | MASCARA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 18, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARTHUR MATNEY CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ARTHUR MATNEY CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ARTHUR MATNEY CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AM COSMETICS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named PROTEIN RICH II
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2015 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 8, 2000 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 8, 2000 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1995 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 30, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 27, 1989 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 31, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 19, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |