USPTO serial 73618560
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W. SACOFF
ROBERT W SACOFF SAIDMAN, STERNE, KESSLER & GOLDSTEIN1225 CONNECTICUT AVEWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | BOARD GAMES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1987 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |