Drawing for THE INTERACTION METHOD

USPTO serial 73618850

THE INTERACTION METHOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE INTERACTION METHOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRUCE W. SCHWAB

Brian L. Michaelis Seyfarth Shaw LLPTwo Seaport Lane, Suite 300Seyfarth Shaw LLPBoston, MA 02210-2028

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035MANAGEMENT CONSULTING AND HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, NAMELY MEETING FACILITATION, GROUP PROBLEM SOLVING, PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT, INNOVATION PLANNING, CONFLICT RESOLUTION, AND IMPLEMENTING CHANGE IN THE WORKPLACEABANDONEDMay 8, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 3, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 30, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 29, 1988CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 1, 1988EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 27, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance