USPTO serial 73618970
MILL KITS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MILL KITS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LONDON, ONTARIO, CA
BLUFFTON AGRI/INDUSTRIAL CORP.
BLUFFTON, IN
LONDON, ONTARIO, CA
LONDON, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | ON-FARM FEED PROCESSING AND MATERIAL HANDLING SYSTEM COMPRISING AN ELECTRONIC FEED PROCESSOR AND PNEUMATIC FEED CONVEYOR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FARMATIC RESEARCH INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BLUFFTON AGRI/INDUSTRIAL CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by 168189 CANADA LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by FARMATIC INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named MILL KITS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |