USPTO serial 73618978
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BOCCHI FOOD TRADE INTERNATIONAL GMBH
5060 BERGISCH GLADBACH 1, DE
Other trademarks owned by BOCCHI FOOD TRADE INTERNATIONAL GMBH
HAPPY TREE, WARENHANDELSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
2000 HAMBURG 1, DE
Other trademarks owned by HAPPY TREE, WARENHANDELSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
BOCCHI FOOD TRADE INTERNATIONAL GMBH
5060 BERGISCH GLADBACH 1, DE
Other trademarks owned by BOCCHI FOOD TRADE INTERNATIONAL GMBH
BOCCHI FOOD TRADE INTERNATIONAL GMBH
5060 BERGISCH GLADBACH 1, DE
Other trademarks owned by BOCCHI FOOD TRADE INTERNATIONAL GMBH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRED W. HATHAWAY
FRED W HATHAWAY VENABLE, BAETJER, HOWARD & CIVILETTI1201 NEW YORK AVE N WSTE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20005| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | HERBAL, FRUIT AND VEGETABLE-BASED DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS; BABY FOOD OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, FOOTWEAR AND HEADWEAR; NAMELY, BOOTS, BATHROBES, SPORTS FOOTWEAR, JACKETS, DRESSES, SWEATERS, SHIRTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, AND SHELLED AND ROASTED NUTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | BREAKFAST CEREALS, SPICES, FOOD FLAVORINGS, FOOD PRESERVATIVES, COCOA- AND CHOCOLATE- FOOD BEVERAGES NOT BEING DAIRY-BASED OR VEGETABLE-BASED | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | FRESH FRUITS AND VEGETABLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | NON-ALCOHOLIC WINE AND BEER, FRUIT JUICE DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES, SYRUPS AND OTHER PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING SOFT DRINKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 1, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 9, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |