Drawing for ASK-ME

USPTO serial 73619354

ASK-ME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, HANNAH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASK-ME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DENNIS L. THOMTE

DENNIS L THOMTE ZARLEY, MCKEE, THOMTE, VOORHEES & SEASE2400 RUAN CTRDES MOINES, IA 50309UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MICROPROCESSOR BASED UNIT FOR DISPLAYING ADVERTISING COMPOSED OF A COMPUTER, COLOR MONITOR, HARD DISK AND PRINTERABANDONEDJul 10, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 1988ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 22, 1987PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 21, 1987NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 14, 1987CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance