USPTO serial 73619398
PROFESSIONAL FOOT CARE PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1468668Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 8, 1987
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROFESSIONAL FOOT CARE PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER J. VRANUM
PETER J VRANUM JANVEY GORDON HERLANDS RANDOLPH & COX355 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | TOE NAIL SCISSORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 7, 1986 |
| 010 | INSOLES, ARCH SUPPORTS, TOE RELIEF PADS, ELASTIC LOOPS FOR TOES TO RELIEVE PAIN OF OVERLAPPING TOES, CORN, BUNION, AND CALLOUS PADS, TOE INSERTS FOR RELIEVING BUNION DISCOMFORT, MOLESKINS, AND HEEL INSERT PADS, ALL FOR ORTHOPEDIC USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 7, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PROFESSIONAL PRODUCT RESEARCH CO. INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PROFOOT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PROFESSIONAL PRODUCT RESEARCH CO. INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named PROFESSIONAL FOOT CARE PRODUCTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1993 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 24, 1993 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1993 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jun 2, 1993 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Feb 12, 1993 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1987 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 8, 1987 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 15, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 10, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |