Drawing for BK CONTEMPRA

USPTO serial 73620048

BK CONTEMPRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SZOKE, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BK CONTEMPRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008SPOONS, FORKS, KNIVESABANDONED—
021SERVING AND TABLE UTENSILS ENAMELLED, ZINC, ALUMINIUM, RUST FREE STEEL, TIN, CHROMIUM-PLATED, PLASTIC AND GLASS HOUSEHOLD ARTICLES AND KITCHEN UTENSILSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 1988ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 23, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 23, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 15, 1988CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 16, 1987REINREINSTATED—
Aug 28, 1987ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance