USPTO serial 73620328
AU CLAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AU CLAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHUO-KU, TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID EHRLICH
DAVID EHRLICH WEISS DAWID FROSS ZELNICK & LEHRMAN PC633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SOAPS; DETERGENTS; DRY CLEANING PREPARATIONS; CLEANSERS; TOOTH PASTE; COSMETICS AND TOILETRIES, NAMELY, FACE POWDERS, CAKE POWDERS, LIQUID POWDERS, CREAM POWDERS, TOILET WATERS, MILK LOTIONS, VISCOUS TOILET WATERS, SHAVING TOILET WATERS, HARD LOTIONS, EAU DE COLOGNES, MEDICATED TOILET WATERS, VANISHING CREAMS, HYGIENIC CREAMS, COLD CREAMS, CLEANSING CREAMS, MEDICATED CREAMS, HAND CREAMS, SHAVING CREAMS, SUNTAN LOTIONS, SUNBURN CREAMS, LIP CREAMS, BLEACHING CREAMS, FOUNDATION CREAMS, ROUGE, LIPSTICK, CREAM ROUGE, PERFUMES, SOLID PERFUMES, PASTE PERFUMES, EYE SHADOW, EYEBROW COLORS, MASCARA, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH REMOVERS, TALCUM POWDERS, DEPILATORIES, SMELLING SALT, BATH SALT, AND SKIN PACKS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1987 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 10, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |