Drawing for EVERFRESH ALL FRUIT SODA

USPTO serial 73621637

EVERFRESH ALL FRUIT SODA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERFRESH ALL FRUIT SODA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EUGENE SABOL

EUGENE SABOL FISHER, CHRISTEN & SABOLSTE 5102000 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032FRUIT JUICE DRINKSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 1990ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 1990ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 5, 1990LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Sep 19, 1989PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 19, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 19, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 1989CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 26, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 7, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance