USPTO serial 73621714
VUARNET V
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O LEAR, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VUARNET V?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS J. MOORE
THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMASFOURTH FL625 SLATERS LNALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | ARTICLES OF CLOTHING, NAMELY, PANTS, KNICKERS, SHORTS, TRUNKS, UNDERWEAR, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, T-SHIRTS, PULLOVERS, SWEATERS, KNITS, VESTS, RAINCOATS, WIND-JACKETS, COATS OVERCOATS, SKIRTS, DRESSES, CAPES, OVERGARMENTS, FURS, SCARVES, SHAWLS, STOLES, SLIPPERS, SOCKS, LEOTARDS, SPORTING CLOTHES, GLOVES, BATHING SUITS, HOUSECOATS, SUSPENDERS, BELTS, TIES, SHOES, BOOTS, SLIPPERS, SANDALS, SPORTING SHOES, SKIING SHOES, TENNIS SHOES, GOLFING SHOES, HATS, BERETS, CAPS, VISORS AND BANDANNAS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1988 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |