USPTO serial 73621770
CRAFT ALPIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRAFT ALPIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD M. PRINCE
EDWARD M PRINCE CUSHMAN, DARBY & CUSHMAN1615 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | SPORTS CLOTHES - NAMELY, JACKETS, VESTS, PANTS, SWEATERS, SHIRTS, OVERALLS, SHORTS, CAPS, SCARVES AND GLOVES; AND UNDERWEAR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 6, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |