USPTO serial 73622072
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. GEORG SEKA
J GEORG SEKA TOWNSEND AND TOWNSENDSTEUART ST TWR 20TH FLONE MARKET PLZSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | KITCHEN GRATER, KITCHEN SHREDDER, CONDIMENT SHAKER, KITCHEN SLICER, GARLIC PRESS, KNIFE, WHISK, EGG BEATER, SPOON, POTATO CHOPPER, CAN OPENER, CHEESE SLICER, KITCHEN TONGS, FOOD SCOOP, FOOD STEAMER, CLEANING PAD, LADLE, KITCHEN TOOL RACK, JUICE SQUEEZER, BOTTLE OPENER, KITCHEN MIXER, FOOD EXTRUDER, SUGAR DISPENSER, FRUIT STONE PITTER, CAKE DECORATING SET, PASTRY CUTTERS, LEMON SQUEEZER, BUTTER CUTTER, FRUIT CORER, CORKSCREW, PASTRY CRIMPER, FORK, SPONGES FOR WASHING AND CLEANING, CLEANING SCRUBBER, KITCHEN SLICE, STRAINER | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | SMALL DOMESTIC UTENSILS OR CONTAINERS (NOT OF PRECIOUS METALS OR COATED THEREWITH); COMBS AND SPONGES; BRUSHES; INSTRUMENTS AND MATERIAL FOR CLEANING PURPOSES; GLASSWARE, PORCELAIN AND EARTHENWARE, NOT INCLUDED IN OTHER CLASSES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |