USPTO serial 73622287
PAK-A-DAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWE, ROBERT J.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAK-A-DAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NORTH HOLLYWOOD, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANK L. ZUGELTER
FRANK L ZUGELTER10221 RIVERSIDE DRSTE 207NORTH HOLLYWOOD, CA 91602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | MULTIPLE VITAMIN AND MINERAL FOOD SUPPLEMENT | ABANDONED | Mar 17, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 26, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 17, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 16, 1989 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 15, 1988 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 14, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 10, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |