Drawing for CLIPPER GRAPHICS MAINFRAME GRAPHICS FOR THE IBM AT/RT

USPTO serial 73622706

CLIPPER GRAPHICS MAINFRAME GRAPHICS FOR THE IBM AT/RT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLIPPER GRAPHICS MAINFRAME GRAPHICS FOR THE IBM AT/RT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN A. PICCIONE

JOHN A PICCIONE O'CONNOR, BROUDE, & SNYDERTHE BAY COLONY CORPORATE CTR950 WINTER ST STE 2300WALTHAM, MA 02154

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042VIDEO DISPLAY GRAPHICS CONTROLLERS THAT PROVIDE HIGH DENSITY, COLOR, RASTER GRAPHICS ON MICROCOMPUTER DISPLAYSABANDONEDAug 15, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 1988ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 4, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance