USPTO serial 73623527
MICROCUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 1988
- Examiner
- COHN, DEBBIE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICROCUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SCHLEICHER & CO. OF AMERICA, INC.
SANFORD, NC
SCHLEICHER & CO. OF AMERICA, INC.
SANFORD, NC
SCHLEICHER & CO. OF AMERICA, INC.
SANFORD, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L.S. VAN LANDINGHAM, JR.
L S VAN LANDINGHAM JR5715 CLYDE RHYNE DRSANFORD, NC 27330UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | HIGH SECURITY PAPER SHREDDERS FOR OFFICE USE IN DESTROYED SENSITIVE DOCUMENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 25, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCHLEICHER & CO. OF AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SCHLEICHER & CO. OF AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SCHLEICHER & CO. OF AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named MICROCUT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 17, 1995 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Nov 21, 1994 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 7, 1994 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1994 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jun 7, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 21, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 15, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 15, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 24, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |