USPTO serial 73623728
CHOCOLATE PEANUT BUTTER CRUNCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1549663Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 25, 1989
- Examiner
- DATRI, ALAN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHOCOLATE PEANUT BUTTER CRUNCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LINDLEY S. BRANSON
LAURA J HEIN GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT , PAPO BOX 2906MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0906UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | ICE CREAM CONFECTION CONSISTING OF HARD ICE CREAM, CHOCOLATE TOPPING, PEANUT BUTTER TOPPING, WHIPPED TOPPING, CHOCOLATE CRUNCH AND A CHERRY, FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 8, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 1995 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 7, 1995 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1989 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 31, 1989 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 3, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |