USPTO serial 73623756
AMBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 10, 1989
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AMBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HINO-SHI, TOKYO, JP
HINO-SHI, TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEONARD HOLTZ
LEONARD HOLTZ FRISHAUF, HOLTZ, GOODMAN & WOODWARD600 THIRD AVE 30TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | SCREEN FABRIC FOR USE IN SCREEN PRINTING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 26, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 1996 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 10, 1989 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 4, 1989 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 17, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 15, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |