Drawing for INFOMAN

USPTO serial 73624365

INFOMAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INFOMAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN P. MCGANN

JOHN P MCGANN NOLTE, NOLTE AND HUNTER350 JERICHO TPKEJERICHO, NY 11753UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SOFTWARE PROGRAMS AND PACKAGESABANDONED
035CONSULTANT AND ADVISORY SERVICES RELATING TO STRATEGIC PLANNING, POLICY ANALYSIS AND NEW POLICY IMPACT STUDIES RELATED TO ACCESS TO INFORMATION, PRIVACY, SECURITY AND VULNERABILITY, TRANSBORDER DATA FLOWS, REGULATORY REFORM, TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY ISSUES; DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SOUND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES FOR ORGANIZATIONS AS REQUIRED BY NEW INFORMATION POLICIES AND COMPUTER/COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; INFORMATION RESOURCE MANAGEMENT INCLUDING: INTEGRATED OFFICE SYSTEMS; RECORDS AND ARCHIVAL MANAGEMENT; LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE; EDITING, INDEXING, CROSS-REFERENCING, BIBLIOGRAPHIC SERVICES; AND, INFORMATION BROKERS AND ONLINE RETRIEVAL SERVICES; DATA PROCESSING AND DATA RESOURCE MANAGEMENT INCLUDING: DATABASE DESIGN AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS CREATION; TURNKEY APPLICATION DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION; AND, DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF MINISIS-BASED APPLICATIONS; DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND MARKETING OF SOFTWARE PROGRAMS AND PACKAGES; BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC CONSULTANTS AND MARKETING SURVEYS INCLUDING SURVEY DESIGN AND ANALYSIS AND SAMPLING STUDIESABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 1987ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 6, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance