USPTO serial 73624447
R CHEMIE-TECHNIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with R CHEMIE-TECHNIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FREDERICK H. RABIN
FREDERICK H RABIN FELFE & LYNCH805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CONTROL AND MEASURING EQUIPMENT - NAMELY, AUTOMATIC CONTROL GLOBE VALVES, AUTOMATIC CONTROL BUTTERFLY VALVES, AUTOMATIC CONTROL BALL VALVES, PRESSURE GAUGES, AND SIGHT FLOW INDICATORS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 5, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 4, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 29, 1988 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 2, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 21, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |