USPTO serial 73624746
STERIFERM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STERIFERM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT I. CANTOR
HERBERT I CANTOR WEGNER & BRETSCHNEIDERTHIRD FL1233 20TH ST NW P O BOX 18218WASHINGTON, DC 20036-8218Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LABORATORY AND MEDICAL, BIOTECHNOLOGICAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS, NAMELY, SCALES, COUNTERS, APPARATUS FOR OBSERVING THE CULTIVATION OF BACTERIA AND OTHER CELLS, APPARATUS FOR MONITORING THE CULTIVATION OF BACTERIA AND OTHER CELLS, REACTORS FOR THE CULTIVATION OF BACTERIA AND OTHER CELLS, AND INCUBATORS | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | APPARATUS FOR USE IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL, MEDICAL AND BIOTECHNOLOGICAL INDUSTRY, NAMELY, HEATERS, STEAM GENERATORS, COOKERS, REFRIGERATORS, DRYERS, AND VENTILATORS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |