Drawing for TECHNOPOLYMERS

USPTO serial 73625015

TECHNOPOLYMERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O LEAR, JANICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TECHNOPOLYMERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERNEST F. CHAPMAN

WILLIAM F MUFATTI GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY1 PLASTICS AVEPITTSFIELD, MA 01201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017PLASTIC SHEETABANDONEDAug 29, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 30, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 30, 1989EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 30, 1989EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 11, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 1987ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 2, 1987NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 28, 1987NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 26, 1987NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 1987CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 23, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance