USPTO serial 73625450
BERKSHIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BERKSHIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EZRA SUTTON
EZRA SUTTON EZRA SUTTON, P.A.PLAZA 9900 ROUTE 9WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, RAINCOATS, SWEATERS, POCKET SQUARES, SCARVES, MANTILLAS, GLOVES, HATS, EARMUFFS, TOPS, BLOUSES, SHIRTS, PANTS, VESTS, AND UNIFORMS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 29, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 29, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 1989 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 1989 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 11, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 25, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 24, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |