USPTO serial 73625726
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TORONTO, CA
INTERBAKE FOODS (1988) LIMITED
MONTREAL QUEBEC, H5B 1B2, CA
INTERBAKE FOODS (1988) LIMITED
MONTREAL QUEBEC, H5B 1B2, CA
ALIMENTS CULINAR INC.-CULINAR FOODS INC.
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by ALIMENTS CULINAR INC.-CULINAR FOODS INC.
ALIMENTS CULINAR INC.-CULINAR FOODS
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by ALIMENTS CULINAR INC.-CULINAR FOODS
ALIMENTS CULINAR INC.-CULINAR FOODS INC.
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by ALIMENTS CULINAR INC.-CULINAR FOODS INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CAROL L. B. MATTHEWS
GADSBY & HANNAHSTE 8001747 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CRACKERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 11, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 3, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 5, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 5, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 2, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |