USPTO serial 73625973
COLIBRI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DATRI, ALAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLIBRI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEUILLY SUR SEINE, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT S. WEISBEIN
ROBERT S WEISBEIN BLUM KAPLAN1120 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | COFFEE, TEA, CHOCOLATE, NAMELY, CHOCOLATE IN TABLETS, POWDER, STICKS, CHECKERS, BALLS, CHOCOLATE WITH ALCOHOL FILING SOLID OR FLUFFED CHOCOLATE; SUGAR, RICE, TAPIOCA, SAGO, CHICORY AND COFFEE SUBSTITUTES; PASTRIES, NAMELY, BISCUITS, CAKES, MADELAINS AND MERINGUE; CANDIES, NAMELY, CHOCOLATE, COFFEE, SUGAR AND FRUIT CANDIES, CANDIES SOLD BY THE PIECE, NOUGAT, SUGARED ALMONDS, CALISSONS, BONBONS, CARMELS, LICORICE; PASTILLES, PASTES AND CHEWING GUM | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 15, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 15, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 20, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 18, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |