USPTO serial 73626036
THE BUG RUNNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 7, 1989
- Examiner
- MARSH, SHARON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE BUG RUNNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BUG RUNNER EXTERMINATING CO., INC., THE
SPRING VALLEY, NY
Other trademarks owned by BUG RUNNER EXTERMINATING CO., INC., THE
BUG RUNNER EXTERMINATING CO., INC., THE
SPRING VALLEY, NY
Other trademarks owned by BUG RUNNER EXTERMINATING CO., INC., THE
BUG RUNNER EXTERMINATING CO., INC., THE
SPRING VALLEY, NY
Other trademarks owned by BUG RUNNER EXTERMINATING CO., INC., THE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. David Dainow
J. David Dainow ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | EXTERMINATING SERVICES AND INCLUDING EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR PEST CONTROL | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1971 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BUG RUNNER EXTERMINATING CO., INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by BUG RUNNER EXTERMINATING CO., INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by BUG RUNNER EXTERMINATING CO., INC., THE
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named THE BUG RUNNER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 5, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 30, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 15, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |