USPTO serial 73626154
MIGHTY MOUSER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 5, 1988
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MIGHTY MOUSER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PROVIDENCE, RI
ROCKFORD, IL
ROCKFORD, IL
EX-CELL-O CONTRACTOR TOOL AND EQUIPMENT CO.
ROCKFORD, IL
Other trademarks owned by EX-CELL-O CONTRACTOR TOOL AND EQUIPMENT CO.
ROCKFORD, IL
EX-CELL-O CONTRACTOR TOOL AND EQUIPMENT CO.
ROCKFORD, IL
Other trademarks owned by EX-CELL-O CONTRACTOR TOOL AND EQUIPMENT CO.
EX-CELL-O CONTRACTOR TOOL AND EQUIPMENT CO.
ROCKFORD, IL
Other trademarks owned by EX-CELL-O CONTRACTOR TOOL AND EQUIPMENT CO.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph M. Lafata
Joseph M. Lafata Harness, Dickey & Pierce PLC5445 Corporate Drive, Suite 200Troy, MI 48098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | VACUUM/BLOWER ELECTRICALLY POWERED CONDUIT FISHING APPARATUS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | ACTIVE | Nov 11, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GREENLEE TEXTRON INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GREENLEE TOOLS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EX-CELL-O CONTRACTOR TOOL AND EQUIPMENT CO.
- Other trademarks owned by GREENLEE TEXTRON INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EX-CELL-O CONTRACTOR TOOL AND EQUIPMENT CO.
- Other trademarks owned by EX-CELL-O CONTRACTOR TOOL AND EQUIPMENT CO.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named MIGHTY MOUSER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 18, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 17, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 21, 1994 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 29, 1993 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 13, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |