Drawing for MVS-MS

USPTO serial 73626242

MVS-MS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MVS-MS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NEAL A. JACKSON

NEAL A JACKSON SANFORD, ADAMS MCCULLOUGH & BEARD2000 M ST N WSTE 880WASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR MAINFRAME COMPUTERS USING THE MULTIPLE VIRTUAL STORAGES ("MVS") OPERATING SYSTEMABANDONEDJul 18, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 1988ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 4, 1988OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 18, 1988OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 15, 1988OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 12, 1988OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 15, 1988OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 2, 1988OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 10, 1987PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 1987NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 1987CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 4, 1987ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 5, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance