USPTO serial 73626281
-MATTHEWS-NORFOLK FARMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 18, 1991
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with -MATTHEWS-NORFOLK FARMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NORWICH, NORFOLK NR9 5QD, GB
NORWICH, NORFOLK NR9 5QD, GB
NORWICH, NORFOLK NR9 5QD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES A. OLIFF
JAMES A OLIFF OLIFF & BERRIDGEP O BOX 19928ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | MEAT, POULTRY AND PREPARED MEAT AND POULTRY PRODUCTS, NAMELY, TURKEYS; TURKEY ROASTS, INCLUDING HERB SEASONED TURKEY ROASTS; TURKEY STEAKS AND FILLETS, WITH AND WITHOUT BREAD CRUMB COATING; TURKEY HAM; SAUSAGES, INCLUDING SMOKED SAUSAGES; TURKEY ESCALOPES WITH BREAD CRUMB COATING; BURGERS, WITH AND WITHOUT BREAD CRUMB COATING; CHOPPED CURED TURKEY WITH PORK IN SLICED FORM WITH BREAD CRUMB COATING, AND WITH AND WITHOUT CHEESE; SHAPED CHOPPED TURKEY PIECES WITH BREAD CRUMB COATING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BERNARD MATTHEWS P.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by BERNARD MATTHEWS P.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by BERNARD MATTHEWS P.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named -MATTHEWS-NORFOLK FARMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 1997 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 18, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 26, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 24, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |