USPTO serial 73626355
VITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M. PITCHER
DAVID M PITCHER STAAS & HALSEY1825 K ST N WSTE 816WASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | SYRUPS AND CONCENTRATES USED IN MAKING SOFT DRINKS, AND SOFT DRINKS MADE THEREFROM | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 23, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |