USPTO serial 73626598
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
PROCTORVILLE, OH
PROCTORVILLE, OH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. MICHAEL GEGENHEIMER
C MICHAEL GEGENHEIMER KILLWORTH, GOTTMAN, HAGAN & SCHAEFFONE DAYTON CTRONE S MAIN ST STE 500DAYTON, OH 45402-2023| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | PROVISION OF DONATION CANDY BOXES, COLLECTION OF DONATIONS FROM THE CANDY BOXES, AND REFILLING THE CANDY BOXES FOR CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Sep 3, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 1991 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 29, 1991 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1988 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 28, 1988 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 26, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |