USPTO serial 73627382
SERAVAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 1994
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SERAVAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FINE CHEMICALS CORPORATION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
CAPE TOWN, ZA
Other trademarks owned by FINE CHEMICALS CORPORATION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
FINE CHEMICALS CORPORATION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
CAPE TOWN, ZA
Other trademarks owned by FINE CHEMICALS CORPORATION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
FINE CHEMICALS CORPORATION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
CAPE TOWN, ZA
Other trademarks owned by FINE CHEMICALS CORPORATION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARGARET F. GOLDSTEIN
MARGARET F GOLDSTEIN WEISS DAWID FROSS ZELNICK & LEHRMAN PC633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | THERAPEUTIC PHARMACEUTICALS; NAMELY, BIOCHEMICAL SUBSTANCES USED IN TREATING, DIAGNOSING AND TESTING FOR A WIDE VARIETY OF DISEASES, DISORDERS AND CONDITIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FINE CHEMICALS CORPORATION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by FINE CHEMICALS CORPORATION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by FINE CHEMICALS CORPORATION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named SERAVAC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 5, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 11, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1991 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 14, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 1990 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |