USPTO serial 73627417
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAN BRUNO, CA
SAN BRUNO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BERTRAM I. ROWLAND
BERTRAM I ROWLAND LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER4600 IBM PLZCHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC TEST FOR DETECTING SWINE INFECTION COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF REAGENTS | ABANDONED | May 6, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 20, 1989 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 1987 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |