Drawing for AVID

USPTO serial 73627417

AVID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WENDEL, HELEN R.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AVID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BERTRAM I. ROWLAND

BERTRAM I ROWLAND LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER4600 IBM PLZCHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC TEST FOR DETECTING SWINE INFECTION COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF REAGENTSABANDONEDMay 6, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 1989OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 20, 1989ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 20, 1989OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 19, 1987OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 16, 1987PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 1987NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 23, 1987CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance