USPTO serial 73627545
TALKING PHONE BOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TALKING PHONE BOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CEDAR RAPIDS, IA
CEDAR RAPIDS, IA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES C. NEMMERS
JAMES C NEMMERS500 MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK BLDGCEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52406UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING ADVERTISING SERVICES FOR OTHERS - NAMELY, PROVIDING PRECORDED TELEPHONE MESSAGES FOR ADVERTISERS IN TELEPHONE DIRECTORIES | ABANDONED | Jul 15, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 24, 1992 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 1991 | CU.D | CONCURRENT USE DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 1990 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |