USPTO serial 73627806
VENICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WISEMAN, MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VENICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HENRY W. LEEDS
HENRY W LEEDS BRYLAWSKI, CLEARY & LEEDS224 E CAPITOL STWASHINGTON, DC 20003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUMERY PRODUCTS, NAMELY, PERFUMES, EAUX DE TOILETTE, EAUX DE COLOGNE, PERFUMED OIL BATH; SHOWER CREAMS AND GELS; COSMETICS, NAMELY, SKIN CARE CREAMS, MILK, LOTIONS AND POWDERS; DEODORANTS FOR PERSONAL USE; HAIR LOTIONS; DENTIFRICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1987 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |