USPTO serial 73627832
LIL ME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIL ME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAN FERNANDO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROD S. BERMAN
ROD S BERMAN SPENSLEY HORN JUBAS & LUBITZ1880 CENTURY PARK ESTE 500LOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | BABY SAFETY HARNESSES | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | BEDDING FOR INFANTS AND BABIES, NAMELY SHEETS, BLANKETS, COMFORTERS, QUILTS, MATTRESS COVERS, CRIB BUMPERS, CRIB AND BED CANOPIES, CRIB AND BED DUST RUFFLES, AND MOSQUITO NETTING, AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS TEXTILE ARTICLES FOR INFANTS AND BABIES, NAMELY, TOWELS, WASHCLOTHS, SEAT COVERS, HIGH CHAIR COVERS, DIAPER BAGS, DIAPER STACKERS, PLAYPEN COVERS, AND WINDOW COVERS BABY BUNTING, BABY BIBS, AND BABY BOOTIES AND SOCKS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |