Drawing for CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE

USPTO serial 73628101

CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PENROSE LUCAS ALBRIGHT

PENROSE LUCAS ALBRIGHT PRAVEL, GAMBRELL, HEWITT & KIMBALL2306 S EADS STP O BOX 2246ARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042SERVICES RENDERED IN CONNECTION WITH PROVIDING DEBT COUNSELING SERVICESABANDONEDMar 10, 1964

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 1992ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 3, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 1991ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 5, 1990EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 2, 1990EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 25, 1989CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 6, 1989CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 10, 1989JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 28, 1988CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 26, 1988CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 17, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 1988JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 30, 1988EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 8, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 10, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance