USPTO serial 73628176
HTH HIGH TECHNOLOGY HOME SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HTH HIGH TECHNOLOGY HOME SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES R. BEZNIK
JAMES R BEZNIKSTE 401540 N LAKE SHORE DRCHICAGO, IL 60611Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | INSTALLATION, REPAIR AND SERVICING OF ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT, NAMELY TELEPHONES, COMPUTER, TELEVISIONS, VIDEOCASSETTE PLAYERS AND STEREO SYSTEMS AND ELECTRONIC PROTECTION SYSTEMS NAMELY, PRODUCTS SOLD INDIVIDUALLY OR AS AN INTEGRATED PACKAGE | ABANDONED | Nov 1, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1988 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 1988 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 1987 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 8, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |