USPTO serial 73628216
LINX TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 21, 1989
- Examiner
- HINES PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LINX TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SECURITY CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC.
CANOGA PARK, CA
SECURITY CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC.
CANOGA PARK, CA
SECURITY CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC.
CANOGA PARK, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID GURNICK
DAVID GURNICK KINDEL & ANDERSON5959 TOPANGA BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 91367UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS AND TERMINALS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS, INSTRUCTION MANUALS FOR USE WITH COMPUTERS AND TERMINALS, SECURITY SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF MAGNETIC CARDS, FOR AUTOMATIC GATES FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS, OPERATED BY MAGNETIC FIELD TRANSMITTERS, CONTROLS AND SENSORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SECURITY CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SECURITY CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SECURITY CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LINX TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1995 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 21, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 29, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1988 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |