USPTO serial 73628712
TRACKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 7, 1992
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRACKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ADAPTIVE ELECTRONICS PTY. LTD.
MELBOURNE, VICTORIA, AU
ADAPTIVE ELECTRONICS PTY. LTD.
MELBOURNE, VICTORIA, AU
MOORABBIN, VICTORIA, AU
ADAPTIVE ELECTRONICS PTY. LTD.
MELBOURNE, VICTORIA, AU
MOORABBIN, VICTORIA, AU
MOORABBIN, VICTORIA, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY HELEN SEARS
MARY HELEN SEARS REID & PRIEST701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTERACTIVE ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS PROSPECT IDENTIFICATION COMPUTER PROGRAMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ADAPTIVE ELECTRONICS PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ADAPTIVE ELECTRONICS PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SOFTCODE PTY., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ADAPTIVE ELECTRONICS PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SOFTCODE PTY., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SOFTCODE PTY., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TRACKER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 7, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 14, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 1, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |