USPTO serial 73628809
TOP HAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOP HAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN D. NIES
JOHN D NIES NIES, WEBNER KURZ & BERGERT1911 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYSTE 700ARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 8, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 13, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1988 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 12, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |