USPTO serial 73629316
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE L. ADAMS
BRUCE L ADAMS ADAMS & WILKS84 WILLIAM STSTE 1000NEW YORK, NY 10038| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT USED FOR TREATING ACIDIFIED LAKES | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | TREATING ACIDIFIED LAKES AND LAKE SEDIMENTS WITH NEUTRALIZATION AGENTS; AND CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF ACIDIFIED LAKES | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | CONSULTING SERVICES RELATING TO THE TREATMENT OF ACIDIFIED LAKES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |