USPTO serial 73629660
HARRODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1829154Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 1994
- Examiner
- FEISTHAMEL, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HARRODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KNIGHTSBRIDGE, LONDON, SW1X 7XL, GB
KNIGHTSBRIDGE, LONDON, SW1X 7XL, GB
KNIGHTSBRIDGE, LONDON, SW1X 7XL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID WEILD, III
DAVID WEILD III PENNIE & EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | fuels and illuminants; namely, firelighters, gas for lighting; candles including candles for Christmas decorations; wicks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 5, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 11, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 14, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1989 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 27, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |