USPTO serial 73629661
HARRODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1824122Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 1, 1994
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HARRODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LONDON, SW1X 7XL, GB
LONDON, SW1X 7XL, GB
LONDON, SW1X 7XL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DIANE DONNELLY
DIANE DONNELLY MALTITZ DERENBERG KUNIN ET AL60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165-0006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | [SIDE ARMS; NAMELY, SWORDS; RAZORS;] CUTLERY; NAMELY, KNIVES, FORKS AND SPOONS; [GARDEN AND] KITCHEN HAND TOOLS; NAMELY, NON-ELECTRIC CAN OPENERS, MEAT CHOPPERS, OYSTER OPENERS, SHARPENING STONES, LADLES, SUGAR TONGS, VEGETABLE PEELERS, VEGETABLE SLICERS, NON-ELECTRIC WAFFLE IRONS, BLADES, [BORDER SHEARS, BUDDING KNIVES, PRUNING SCISSORS, SECATEURS IN THE NATURE OF PRUNING SHEARS, SHOVELS, SPADES AND TROWELS; CHISELS, PENKNIVES, PLIERS, SAWS, SCREWDRIVERS;] MANICURE SETS COMPRISING CUTICLE NIPPERS, HAIR CLIPPERS, NAIL FILES AND SCISSORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2004 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 20, 2000 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 28, 2000 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 7, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1989 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 28, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 1988 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 16, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |