USPTO serial 73629886
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANA SIGARS
ANN E NEAL FOWLER, WHITE BURNETT, HURLEY, BANICK& STRICKROOT, PA175 N W 1ST AVE 11TH FLMIAMI, FL 33128-1817| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | CRUISE LINE SERVICES | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 23, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 23, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 23, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 26, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |