USPTO serial 73630786
EB BUGATTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EB BUGATTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEONARD W. SHERMAN
LEONARD W SHERMAN SHERMAN & SHALLOWAYP O BOX 788ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETIC SKIN LOTIONS, CREAMS AND GELS, PERFUMES AND FRAGRANCES FOR THE BODY, HAIR SHAMPOOS AND CONDITIONERS, BATH AND BEAUTY SOAPS AND DENTIFRICES | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1975 |
| 025 | WOMEN'S BLOUSES, SKIRTS, PANTS, DRESSES AND SHOES, MEN'S SHIRTS, SWEATERS, PANTS, SOCKS AND SHOES | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1975 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 6, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 6, 1989 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |